Section 508 compliance is usually discussed as a software and website concern: accessible interfaces, screen reader compatibility, web content that meets WCAG standards. That framing leaves out a real requirement that catches federal procurement teams off guard: Section 508 explicitly covers hardware too, not just the software running on it, and skipping accessibility documentation during hardware procurement can create a real compliance gap.
Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 requires federal agencies to develop, buy, and use accessible Information and Communication Technology, a category that explicitly includes websites, software, electronic documents, multimedia, and hardware. The technical standard is WCAG 2.0 Level AA, incorporated into the Section 508 standards through a 2017 Access Board refresh that took effect in 2018. Organizations increasingly target WCAG 2.1 or 2.2 Level AA to stay ahead of overlapping requirements from other accessibility regulations, even though WCAG 2.0 AA remains the formal Section 508 baseline.
The Federal Acquisition Regulation requires Section 508 compliance language in ICT contracts, which means accessibility isn’t an optional consideration layered onto federal procurement after the fact, it’s a required element of the solicitation and evaluation process itself.
Federal buyers often assume Section 508 obligations end once a hardware purchase is technically working and the software running on it has been accessibility-reviewed. That assumption misses real hardware-level accessibility considerations that fall under the same standard.
A hardware vendor unfamiliar with these requirements may treat Section 508 purely as a software vendor’s problem, leaving a federal buyer to discover the gap during their own compliance review, a considerably worse time to find it than during initial vendor evaluation.
Federal buyers require vendors to demonstrate accessibility conformance through a Voluntary Product Accessibility Template, commonly called a VPAT, or an equivalent Accessibility Conformance Report. This document details how a specific product conforms to the relevant accessibility standards, criterion by criterion, rather than making a general accessibility claim.
Requesting a current, product-specific VPAT should be a standard part of federal hardware procurement, not a follow-up request triggered only when a compliance question arises. A generic accessibility statement is not the same thing as a VPAT, and buyers should be cautious about accepting one in place of the other.
Ace Computers works with federal buyers to understand accessibility documentation requirements as part of the broader procurement conversation, helping confirm that hardware acquisition records include the VPAT and compliance documentation a buying program’s own Section 508 review will eventually ask for.
→ Contact Ace Computers Federal Sales Team
Section 508 explicitly covers hardware as part of Information and Communication Technology, alongside software, websites, electronic documents, and multimedia. Hardware-level considerations include physical operability, assistive technology compatibility, and accessible documentation.
A Voluntary Product Accessibility Template, or VPAT, documents how a specific product conforms to accessibility standards criterion by criterion. Federal buyers should request a current, product-specific VPAT as a standard part of hardware procurement, not as a follow-up request.
Section 508 incorporates WCAG 2.0 Level AA as its technical standard, established through a 2018 Access Board refresh. Many organizations target WCAG 2.1 or 2.2 Level AA to stay ahead of overlapping accessibility requirements from other regulations.
Ace Computers works with federal buyers to understand accessibility documentation requirements relevant to their specific procurement, helping ensure the acquisition record includes what a buying program’s own compliance review will require.
